On Avatars

Why can’t they look at least a little like the person they represent?

Like so many techno-geeks these days, I’m involved in a bunch of social networking sites: Twitter, LinkedIn, FaceBook, RedBubble, Flickr, MyBlogLog, etc. And all of these sites give each member the ability to include an avatar — an image to represent that user.

Maria Langer AvatarMaybe I’m not very creative, but my avatar is a photo of me. It was taken by photographer Jon Davison during one of our flights last September. It shows me in one of my favorite places: at the controls of my helicopter, flying over the Arizona desert. (I think I’m over the Little Colorado River Gorge in this shot.)

The way I see it, my avatar is supposed to represent me. What could represent me better than a photo of me doing something I like to do?

Evidently, not everyone has the same idea. While many of the avatars I see in Twitterrific are photos or drawings of the people they represent, quite a few are not. And in other social networking sites — MyBlogLog comes to mind — the majority of avatars don’t bear any resemblance to the people they’re supposed to represent.

I find this bothersome, especially among my Twitter friends. Why? Well, in most cases, an avatar is the only visual representation I have for a person. If the avatar features purple hair or a goofy cartoon face — you know who you are, folks! — that’s the image I have of that person. And it’s a lot tougher for me to take these unrealistic avatars seriously.

Maybe I’m old fashioned, but I find it easier to communicate with people I can take seriously.

A few more notes on avatars:

  • Some people seem to like using their Second Life avatars as their social networking avatar. While I could write a dissertation covering my thoughts about Second Life — starting with, is your first life so bad that you need a second one? — I’ll just say that Second Life avatars are generally a highly stylized version of how people want to look. While few of us are supermodels, surely there’s a decent photo of these people somewhere that they can use online.
  • Some people use glamour photos for avatars. I have a colleague who does this. When I met her in real life, I didn’t recognize her. Let’s face it, we only look like our glamour photos in our glamour photos — after they’ve done the photo shoot and brought our faces into Photoshop for some digital plastic surgery. Every time I see this avatar, I have to remind myself that she doesn’t really look like the photo. (Of course, it’s also made me want to get a glamour photo.)
  • Some people use photos of their pets as avatars. Talk about going to the dogs! Do the dogs really look better? Or do they just identify with their dogs? Ditto for cats, birds, and miscellaneous wild animals.

Of course, none of this has to do with special-purpose avatars used to promote an idea or cause. An example is the Frozen Pea avatars that many of us wore on Twitter for a few Fridays to raise awareness and funds for Breast Cancer Research through the Frozen Pea Fund. I was a single pea for the day. My favorite avatar was one Twitter friend who created an image of his head sticking out of a pea car.

But I’d like to start a movement among serious social networkers. Be proud of your face and show it off as your avatar! It doesn’t have to be a full-face shot; it can be creative. (Some of the best avatars I’ve seen show only part of a person’s face.) But it should show you, as you really are.

I’d just like to see who I’m tweeting to.

A Flight Down Burro Creek

Following a flooded desert stream.

Note To Readers:
This post was removed for three years because readers bothered my client. Since then, my client has left the area, returning its site to the way it was before they arrived to work there. Because the client is long gone and because this blog post remains one of my more interesting flying accounts, I’ve returned it to the blog’s timeline in its original position.

Yesterday, around midday, I took two passengers down the length of Burro Creek from its confluence with at Kaiser/Warm Spring Canyon to Alamo Lake. My passengers were part of a drilling operation that had lost some materials downstream during a flood the night before. They wanted to inspect the damage to their camp from the air and try to find the missing materials.

I met them at what they told me was a helicopter landing zone. It was actually a well-maintained dirt road just west of highway 93, north of the Kaiser Canyon Bridges. They’d provided the GPS coordinates and I punched them into my helicopter’s GPS while it was warming up on the ramp at Wickenburg. It would be a 50-mile flight each way, just to get them, and then a flight until we either found the materials, gave up, or got to fuel situation where I’d have to land.

I filled up with fuel at Wickenburg before departing. Although Lake Havasu City was the closest fuel to their location, it was pretty far out of my way. I’d prefer refueling at Wickenburg and they’d prefer it, too, since it would save them at least $500.

The Flight Up

I listened to podcasts on my iPod on the way up. My iPod can connect to the helicopter’s audio system, so when my aviation radio is active with calls, the iPod goes quiet. But I was tuned into 122.9 most of the way and since it’s mostly used as a UNICOM frequency for very small and private airports, it was pretty much dead. Nothing to disturb my listening pleasure.

Although it was a beautiful day, it was windy. The wind had been gusting to 15 mph at Wickenburg before I departed and the farther northwest I got, the windier it got. I had a good tailwind for most of the way, so while I was indicating 110 knots airspeed, my GPS told me I was really getting about 125 knots groundspeed. The sky was full of huge puffy clouds like the ones I used to see quite often back east. But these were much lower — perhaps 1500 to 2000 feet off the ground. As I climbed with the terrain, they got lower. So, in the back of my mind, I was thinking about the return trip and routes I could take if the clouds started obscuring the mountains around my usual route.

My route was pretty simple; I followed the GPS’s guidance to the Santa Maria River, then followed Route 93 up into the mountains. There are some high tension power lines that run along Route 93 in the area, sometimes on the southwest side, sometimes on the northeast side. You have to pay attention to where they are as you fly up that way — keep tabs on them. I was much higher than the towers, but in the event of a problem, I didn’t want to land anywhere near them.

I was approaching the bridges over Burro Creek, where I’d landed before, when the new LZ’s waypoint came into view. It was only a few miles farther up the road. Soon I caught sight of a white pickup truck parked on a dirt road on a ridge. I descended down and around the to spot, made sure the power lines were far behind me, and made my approach. Although no particular place was marked as a landing zone, the spot I picked was quite firm and level. There wasn’t even much dust because of the heavy rain the night before. I landed facing the truck, about 50 feet away.

I signaled my passengers to approach and opened up the door in front of me and the door behind me. When doing a search from the air, it’s best to have the searcher’s eyes spread out with at least one pair on either side of the aircraft. They were two youngish guys, probably in their late twenties or early thirties. As they got in and buckled up, I gave them a passenger briefing. I made sure their doors were secured. Then, as two big trucks came up the road and waited for us to depart, I took off.

Burro Creek

Burro Creek AreaBurro Creek (red on the map here) is a typical desert mountain water course. Nestled in rocky canyons, it drains the area north of Bagdad, AZ. Its multiple tributaries come together a few miles upstream from where it crosses Route 93.

At the crossing, there’s a beautiful steel arch bridge. The original bridge was built in 1966, but a duplicate bridge was built beside it just a few years ago when the road was widened and extra lanes were added (see photo below). The canyon there is deep on both sides, then drops off on the south side where BLM has put in a campground.

Burro Creek Bridge

After the campground, the canyon walls climb on both sides as the creek winds through some mountains. That’s where Kaiser/Warm Spring Canyon (blue on the map) joins it. They continue the course as Burro Creek about 8 to 10 miles where Burro Creek joins the Big Sandy River (green on the map). From there, the Big Sandy River continues through flat land and then more mountains.

The Santa Maria River (orange on the map) joins them just before they all spill into Alamo Lake, which sits at the bottom of a broad, relatively flat valley, with mountains on its north side. What comes out of Alamo Lake, past the dam, is called the Bill Williams River, which eventually spills into the Colorado River.

Burro Creek usually has some water in it. Pools form under the bridge and then in the canyon just before the Kaiser Canyon confluence. In most cases, the water is a trickle between these pools that dries up before Kaiser Canyon.

Kaiser Canyon, which is also known as Warm Spring Canyon because of a hot spring at the bottom of the canyon, is normally dry, except for where the spring is. Upstream, it’s an interesting hike though a narrow slot canyon. I would not want to be there during a heavy rain.

The Big Sandy River is a lot like the Hassayampa, which flows through Wickenburg. It’s mostly sandy riverbed with water flowing underneath, but when there’s heavy rain, it flows. The Santa Maria is more likely to flow than the Big Sandy, but most of its course is through canyon areas just south of the Arrastra Wilderness, passing between the Poachie Range and the Black Mountains.

Yesterday, of course, Burro Creek, the Big Sandy River, and the Santa Maria River were all running at low flood stage. It had rained all day the day before and most of the night before. The heavy rain, winds, and flood waters had destroyed my client’s drilling camp and washed away the materials we were looking for.

So I started my flight for them with a few circuits around their camp at the bottom of the Burro Creek Canyon. I couldn’t get beneath the canyon walls because it was very windy, very turbulent, and very narrow. But I showed them enough for them to get a sense of the damage done and possibly find some other equipment that may or may not have been lost. They took pictures, of course, so they could share what they’d seen with their crew.

From there, we headed down Burro Creek. The water flowed beneath us in a silt-filled torrent, tumbling over boulders in the stream bed and crashing into canyon walls at sharp turns. I could imagine a kayaker down there, paddling to find the best course, getting covered with cold, fine sand. Ick. I could also imagine the lost equipment floating along in the current, racing downstream.

When the canyon ended, I was able to drop down closer to the water. The Big Sandy added its water to the flow and the river spread wide. We were flying into the sun and fighting against its glare to see. We didn’t see the lost items, although there were plenty of places on either side of the river where it could have been caught in trees, weeds, etc.

We reached the place where Signal Road meets Seventeen Mile Road. There are a few houses there and three places where wires cross the river. I wasn’t low enough for them to be a problem, but I liked being able to see them.

The river forked to two paths near there and my client told me to take the larger path. We continued downriver, searching. Then the river entered another canyon area and I had to climb a bit. One spot was turbulent enough to knock us sideways, but I straightened us out and continued. No sign of the equipment we were looking for.

At this point, I began to feel bad for my clients. They were paying me $495/hour to help them find this equipment and we weren’t having much luck. They were already into it for at least an hour to cover my time to get to them and back to Wickenburg. Before we were done, I’d have cost them over $1,000. I really wanted to help them find something.

But as we continued downstream, it looked less and less likely that we’d succeed.

Finally, we emerged from the last canyon where the Santa Maria River joined the flow. Alamo Lake was ahead of us. Normally a clear blue body of water, it was stained brown with silt and floating debris where the rivers joined it. A fishing boat was picking its way through the debris with two men on board. There was no sign of the missing equipment floating on the lake.

I turned around and we headed back upstream. Now the sun was at our back and it was a lot easier to see what we were flying over. We could clearly see wet and dry spots on the wide river bed. Wet spots are where the equipment could be; dry spots were not. Since I knew exactly where all the wires were, I was able to drop down closer to the water surface. We followed the course of the river upstream winding through the canyons and back into the wide, flat area just downstream from the Big Sandy’s confluence.

When we reached the spot that the river had split, I suggested that we try the other fork. They agreed. So I followed that upstream.

We were just downstream from the split when I spotted it: a black barrel with a white label on it. I pointed it out. “Is that one of them?”

They looked. “Yeah, it is. Good eyes.”

We came down for a closer look. It was a 55-gallon metal drum beached on the island between the two river courses. My clients wanted me to land, but there was no truly safe place to do so — the island was a mix of fine sand and large, round river rocks, with no level spots nearby. So I hovered right up to it. We looked at it together and my client took photos. The barrel looked as if it had been over Niagara Falls. Fortunately, there was a road and those homes not far from where we’d found it. When the water receded a bit, it would be easy to recover.

We continued upstream, looking for another barrel just like it. We circled around a few times, but didn’t have much luck. A few minutes later, we were back at the canyon. The wind was howling and I had to climb. We had a close call with a bird that all three of us saw fly past under the helicopter’s bubble. We circled around the ruined camp again and they took more photos. They wanted me to descend into the canyon, but it would not have been safe and I told them so. Instead, we climbed out, back to the LZ. We had a bit of help from a powerful updraft.

“Feel that?” I said as the vertical speed indicator hit 800 feet per minute.

They both did.

“I’m not doing it,” I told them. And I think they got an idea of what it might have been like fighting the wind in that narrow canyon.

I set down at the Landing Zone and they gathered their things together. I told them I’d send them a copy of their receipt; I already had a credit card to charge for the flight. They got out and walked back to their truck. I checked their doors, then plugged my iPod back in and started it up. Then I took off in a climbing right turn back toward Wickenburg.

The Flight Back

I had a headwind all the way back and couldn’t get a groundspeed above 100 knots. I went the most direct route I could, but did make sure I overflew the Barnes Ranch on the Santa Maria River. Eric Barnes has a landing strip there with a taildragger he uses to come to Wickenburg, where he keeps a car. But the river had cut off the ranch from the road. I made a few calls down to them on 122.9 — that’s the frequency they monitor at home — offering to take them into town. But I got no answer, so I continued without stopping.

The turbulence I was flying in faded when I got out of the mountainous area. But by the time I got to Wickenburg, the FBO guy was telling landing traffic that the wind was 20 miles per hour from 140 degrees. That’s a direct crosswind at Wickenburg. Three planes were in the area — all student pilots with instructors — and I made appropriate calls so they’d know where I was. I landed from the northwest, directly into the wind, across the runway to the ramp. It’s nice to be a helicopter.

Total time for the flight: 2.3 hours.

Marie Antoinette, the Movie

Don’t waste your time.

Marie AntoinetteOn Saturday, after a long day on my feet as a volunteer for the Land of the Sun Endurance Ride here in Wickenburg, I found myself in front of the television. I flipped to one of the movie channels just as Marie Antoinette was beginning and decided to give it a try.

I like movies with historical value. I feel as if I can learn while being entertained. And I don’t think anyone can argue that the costumes and sets in the movie were magnificent and probably true to life.

Unfortunately, that’s where the movie’s appeal to me ended.

The movie is long and rambling and takes forever to make and complete a point. For example, the movie suggests that Marie and Louis did not consummate their marriage for more than 4 years — until after he became King, in fact. While this might be an interesting point, it dominated the plot for at least 45 minutes of the movie. One soon gets tired of seeing Marie in bed alone as the signal to viewers that she went yet another night without getting any.

Throughout the movie, I kept waiting to see when the political unrest of the people would make itself known to Marie or the ill-fated members of the French nobility. Is it possible that these people really had no clue about what was going on outside their palaces?

A serious problem with the movie was its soundtrack. While the director and composer are true to the time with the classical music played during Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette’s wedding dance, for example, the rest of the movie is a mix of classical and what I can only describe as European pop. Watching dancers at an 18th century masked ball, wearing period costumes and dancing period dances while modern pop music blared was weird, to say the least. It also took away from the seriousness of the movie, making it seem as if the Director was making light of the whole thing. The soundtrack was inappropriate for the subject matter.

I can’t comment on the acting because although the characters were somewhat believable, I don’t think any of the actors were outstanding. There was very little dialog. One cornball scene shows Marie, fully attired in one of her beautiful dresses, stretched out in happiness in a field of grass and flowers. It’s the scene right after she’s finally had sex with her husband. She’s happy. Oddly enough, it reminded me of the scene in Caddyshack where the girlfriend (Maggie) is dancing on the golf course at night because she knows she’s not pregnant.

While the director, Sofia Coppola, may have wanted to paint a more human picture of Marie, she certainly didn’t do much to create audience sympathy for her character. Coppola’s Marie was a party girl who ate and drank and shopped and played almost non-stop. History tells us that the people of France were being taxed to the point of starvation in many cases, yet the French nobility were living it up in sheltered isolation. Yet no where in the movie — at least not up to the point where I gave up on it after 90 minutes of boredom — is any of that shown. It’s a truly one-sided view of that time in history, a view through the eyes of an immature and spoiled woman.

I admit that I didn’t see the end. Mike joined me about halfway through and he’d already seen it. At one point, I asked him if anything interesting happens. He said no, just more of the same until the screen goes black. I’d seen enough, so I turned it off.

What got me to watch it at all was the rating in the Dish Network info box: three out of four stars. If I’d rated it, it probably would have gotten 1-1/2 stars.

Round Robin Photo Challenge: Landmarks

The Mittens.

This afternoon, I stumbled upon a blog devoted to sharing photos. The description on the Round Robin Photo Challenges page states:

Welcome to the official information and update journal for the Round Robin Photo Challenges. This is where you will find all the details for each photo challenge, such as the subject, the link to blog or journal where each challenge is being hosted, and all updates to the players participation lists.

The current challenge can be found at “Round Robin Challenge: Landmarks:”

Again, let’s take an opportunity to show off our hometowns. I live in the Bay Area, so I have no real shortage of recognizable landmarks, so what I would do is try to show those landmarks in an interesting lighting circumstance, such as a sunset, or under special lighting conditions. But I want to see other places, and the landmarks that make those places so special. A beautifully designed building, an incredible bridge, or a monument of some sort, or maybe even an unusual road sign. It’s all good!

Unfortunately, there’s no landmark in my current home town that I want to show off. As the Mayor and Council continue to make decisions that destroy what was special about Wickenburg — cutting down tall trees bordering a park, allowing new housing developments where there were once horse trails, approving road construction that will destroy the downtown riverfront — I prefer to look away, to the places that remain unspoiled.

I get around a lot — probably a lot more than most folks. And I visit a lot of landmark locations in the Southwest. And I usually have a camera with me. So there were a lot of “stock” photos in my iPhoto library to choose from. Many of them represent places I wish I could spend even more time.

I chose The Mittens — or the Mitten Buttes — in Monument Valley. Although the Tribal Park overlook where I took this photo is in Arizona, the buttes themselves are in Utah. This isn’t a terribly special photo — it was taken from the ground at a viewpoint every tourist stops at. But I like the lighting of this shot. It was an October morning, with light coming from the southeast. I like the way it illuminates the rock in the foreground, giving it texture and color far more interesting than the famous monuments that stand beyond it.

So, for what it’s worth, this is my entry. I hope to be a regular participant.

Tourist Photos from San Francisco

Or fun with a camera.

Note to feed subscribers: You may not see the photos in this article in your RSS reader. That’s because of the way they’re embedded. If you like photography, I do hope you’ll take a moment to visit the site and see the photos. If you don’t, just skip it. I understand.

I was in San Francisco last week for Macworld Expo. In the old days, I used to spend every day at the show. Nowadays, I’m more interested in seeing things outside the exhibit hall. With a half day to spend on my own, I took the cable car from Market and Powell to Fisherman’s Wharf. Here are some of the photos I took that morning.

I started my day just after sunrise at the corner of Powell and Market, five or six blocks from Moscone Hall, where Macworld Expo is held each year. This is the terminus for two of San Francisco’s three cable car lines. The photo here shows one of the cable car drivers turning the car around for the trip back to Fisherman’s Wharf. Although the photo is distorted (because of that darn fisheye lens I like so much), the ground here is relatively level. They manually push the car onto the turntable and turn it, then push it back onto the main track. After paying off a homeless person for telling me that I could buy my ticket on the cable car — it was either that or buy a newspaper I didn’t want to carry — and assuring another homeless person that I didn’t need him to take a photo of me and the cable car with my camera, I climbed on board.

The cable car took off up Powell a while later with a surprising number of people on board. The corner of Market and Powell isn’t far from the BART station and apparently the cable car is a valid mode of transportation for commuters. There certainly weren’t many tourists on board at 7:30 AM. We climbed up Powell, dropping off passengers here and there. I took this photo when the car was nearly empty. Again, there’s some distortion from the fisheye lens, but I think it’s a cool shot of the cable car and its driver.

The car deposited me at Bay Street about two blocks from Fisherman’s Wharf. From there, I wandered around, taking photos of the area. The sun was too low to get the shots I wanted, so went in search of breakfast. Boudin’s Bakery was there and I stepped inside. I love freshly baked bread, but I was on a diet and trying hard to avoid excess carbs. But I did get a good photo op when I saw this “Bread Line” sign. It was just too ironic for me to pass up.

Back outside at the Wharf with the sun still too low for shadow-free photos, I asked one of the fish guys where I could get a good breakfast in a place the tourists didn’t go. He pointed up the street to a “hole in the wall” called Darren’s Cafe. While waiting for my meal, I snapped this weird self-portrait with that fisheye lense. I don’t look happy here, probably because I knew the camera was shooting a picture up my nose.

After breakfast, I strolled north along the wharf area, stopping a few times to take photos of the fishing boats. Unlike most tourists, I didn’t stick to the well-trodden places. I poked around on all the piers, taking my time and seeing as many different things from as many different angles as I could. It was a beautiful day with clear blue skies and light wind. Not very cold, either. Here are a few of my more interesting shots in that area.

After a while, I found myself in Aquatic Park, which is part of the San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park. There are a number of old, art deco buildings there and the light was just right to get creative with some shapes and shadows on a round building that used to house a public restroom. A flight of stairs curved up the side of the building to an observation deck on top. But the views from up there didn’t interest me as much as the stairs, shown here.

From the park, there were sweeping views of San Francisco Bay. But the best views were obviously from the curving arm of the Municipal Pier. So I took off on foot along the long, crumbling concrete and steel pier. The only people on the pier were a handful of Asian fisherman, although when I reached the remains of the building at the far end, another tourist pedaled up on a bicycle. We had a short chat before I walked back. Here are the photos I took along the way. They show, in order, the rust of steel embedded in the concrete, the Golden Gate Bridge, and Alcatraz.

It was nearly 10 AM by the time I got off the pier. I had to check out of my hotel by 1:30 PM, but I had a few errands to take care of on the way back. So I walked up to the cable car terminus at Hyde, which is just a few blocks away. By this time, the tourists were coming out and there was about a dozen people waiting. I snapped a series of photos of the cable car being turned. If I look at them quickly in sequence, they look like a movie. Here are five of the six shots in miniature:

Cable Car Turning at Hyde

On the way back to the Union Square area, I had a nice conversation with a woman who lives in San Francisco and uses the cable car to commute back and forth to work across the city. I couldn’t help but be envious. How wonderful it would be to ride in an open seat through such a beautiful city every day.