Never Stop Thinking

I think of an experiment to test a theory.

As I age, I find that my mind often wanders into different directions, normally unbidden. I think it’s because I have very little in the way of distractions in my home: I live alone and I don’t have a TV going all the time. This gives me time to think — and sometimes I think about unusual things.

The Science of Hot Coffee

This morning, I thought about why it was so important for me to warm my coffee cup before brewing coffee into it and why it was equally important to get the metal teaspoon I use to add sugar and stir out of that cup as quickly as possible. It all has to do with temperature: keeping that coffee hot as long as possible so I could enjoy it at my own pace before it got cold.

The warmed coffee cup is pretty obvious — we’ve all had the experience of putting a salad on a dish still hot from the dishwasher. The salad touching the plate isn’t as cold as the salad that isn’t. This is why they chill salad plates (and forks) at good restaurants. It follows that putting something hot into a cold vessel will do the same. I guarantee you’ve experienced this yourself. I know only one other person who takes the time to warm his coffee cup before putting coffee in it.

(And yes, I know a lot of folks don’t give a damn about what they likely consider a minuscule temperature change. But I do.)

But the spoon? Why is it so important for me to remove the spoon quickly?

This morning I thought a little about that. I’d always assumed that the stainless steel teaspoon would act as a heat sink. One end is in the hot coffee and the other is in the relatively cool kitchen. The heat from the coffee would heat up the spoon, which was made of metal — an excellent conductor of heat — and that heat would travel up the spoon handle to its end. The handle, which was constantly being warmed by the coffee would be constantly cooled by room temperature. That heat energy that is lost would have to come from somewhere: the coffee.

This is something I’ve always assumed. It makes sense to me. But this morning, for some reason, I wondered if I was right. And then I came up with an experiment to test my theory.

The Scientific Method


Scientific Method diagram by Wikipedia user Efbrazil used via CC 4.0 license.

I was in fifth grade when I learned about the scientific method. That was a long time ago and, not being a scientist or in any way involved in lab work my entire life, you’d think I’d forget it. But some things just stick with me. I think the scientific method stuck with me because it made sense logically — and I’m definitely a logical thinker.

Don’t worry — I won’t go into the scientific method in detail here. I’ll just focus on this diagram, which shows all steps to the method. The important concept to take away from this is that it starts with a question you might want answered and then goes through the process of coming up with a possible answer (hypothesis) and testing that answer (experiment). If the results (analyzed data) support the hypothesis, you might be done; if they don’t, then you’re definitely not done. In either case, you’d likely explore other hypotheses, going through the process again (and again and again, if necessary) until you either couldn’t get an answer — i.e., the experiment results simply do not support any hypothesis — or you were confident that one of your hypotheses was correct.

When I thought up an experiment to test my theory about a stainless steel teaspoon as a heat sink, I realized I was using the scientific method. In real life — not in a lab, not as a scientist. It was a great example about how some of the stuff we learn in school that we don’t think we’ll ever use in life does become relevant every once in a while.

Want to see the process for my experiment? Here are the first four steps:

  1. Observation/Question – More of a question: does coffee get cold faster if you leave a teaspoon in it?
  2. Research Topic Area – Well, understanding what a heat sink is is probably important to forming a hypothesis.
  3. Hypothesis – Yes, coffee does get cold faster if I leave a stainless steel teaspoon in it than if I don’t. (This would not apply to a plastic teaspoon since plastic is a poorer conductor of heat than metal.)
  4. Experiment – Take two identical cups. Add an equal amount of boiling water to each cup. Put a room temperature teaspoon inside one cup. Take temperature readings every 5 to 10 minutes to see if the one with the teaspoon gets cold faster. (You could expand the experiment to include three cups and put a plastic teaspoon in the third to test the hypotheses that plastic teaspoons would not have an effect.)

That’s as far as I got. I thought up the experiment but I didn’t do it. It simply isn’t that important to me to know, one way or the other, if I’m right. But it might make a nice at-home experiment for home-schooled kids if you happen to know any. Science is important — and heat sinks are a part of our every day life — they’re inside every computer we own.

Why Blog about It?

Why am I blogging about this? Well, I think I surprised myself this morning by my train of thought and where it led me. I wanted to share that with other folks who might find themselves consumed with things that prevent them from thinking for themselves.

All for clicks and likes

Let me take a moment to mention how outside pressures, especially from social media, get people to do things just for clicks and likes. Just this morning, I read another gender reveal tragedy story — too many gender reveals exist solely to impress others with their outrageousness. People are dying because a blog post that went viral has convinced people to make their own viral moment centered around the gender of their unborn child. Are we really that dumb? That 15 minutes of fame can put lives at risk?

This is an extreme, of course, but think about the not-so-smart things you’ve done to impress your friends and others over the years. Those “watch this” moments. Ever think of why you were really doing them? Or what the consequences could have been if what you did backfired? Is it really that important to impress others?

How about impressing yourself instead?

Every day, we’re faced with a barrage of inputs from family, friends, strangers, advertisers, and the news media. Direct conversation, text, and email; social media posts by people with their own agenda; print, audio, and video advertisements on billboards, in magazines, and everywhere online and on television; network and cable news broadcasters. Too much of that input is trying to fill your head with someone else’s thoughts and ideas and manipulate your opinions. If you follow politics at all, you know exactly what I mean. It’s hard to have a moment to yourself, a time to just think based on verifiable facts and to form your own ideas and opinions.

I do this a lot. Yes, I spend a lot too much time on Twitter but that’s the only social media I allow access to my brain. (Seriously folks, #DeleteFacebook.) And even then, I’m careful about who I follow. I don’t want a diet of political nonsense from either side so I tend to avoid accounts that post just politics. Instead, I try to get tweets from fellow thinkers — or at least from folks who have a life that doesn’t revolve around cable news and the latest political/celebrity scandal. And when I’m not on Twitter — which really is most of the time — I keep active and work on ways to make my life fulfilling.

I think therefore I am. If you can’t think for yourself, do you really exist?

Anyway, does leaving a stainless steel teaspoon in your coffee make it cool faster? If you do the experiment, let me know.

Flying in a Heat Wave: Safe? Legal?

I explore the logic behind performance charts and what the FAA told me about flying in hot weather.

Upcoming Weather
Next week’s weather. It’s going to be hot.

I have a Part 135 check ride coming up on Tuesday. Per the National Weather Service — my primary source of weather information — the forecast high in Wenatchee for that day is 112°F.

If you live in any country other than the metric-unfriendly US, that’s 44.4°C.

IGE Hover Chart
The IGE Hover Chart for an R44 Raven II does not chart any performance data for temperatures above 40°C.

The In Ground Effect (IGE) Hover charts for a Robinson R44 Raven II, which is what I fly, end at 40°C. That is, they do not provide any performance data for 44.4°C.

Now I learned to fly in Arizona and on a typical summer afternoon, 112°F was not uncommon. We flew in all kinds of heat. Hell, I remember landing at Bullhead City one day and reading 123°F on my outside air temperature (OAT) gauge. (And that was in a helicopter without air conditioning.) If the flight school I attended — which is still in business — didn’t fly when it was above 104°F (40°C), they wouldn’t be able to fly half the day about a third of the year. No one questioned whether it was safe or legal. We just did it.

Time went by. Someone suggested to me that flying when the temperature was above 40°C was not only unsafe but illegal. “You’re a test pilot when you do that,” more than a few people have told me. “Your insurance wouldn’t cover you in a crash,” another said, “because you’re operating outside of published data.”

Curious to see what other pilots thought about this, I put a poll on Twitter and gave the Pilots of Twitter 24 hours to respond. I also asked for comments. A lively discussion got going in the comments. It was also pointed out that I could have added “Unsafe but legal” as one of the options with the shared opinion that “the FAA gives you enough rope to hang yourself with.”

I do recall airplanes being grounded at Phoenix Sky Harbor airport one day when temperatures were “too hot” for some of the airliners, although it wasn’t clear from articles I read about how the limit was established.

Well, in an effort to head off a “gotcha” by my FAA examiner, I emailed him this morning to warn him of the heat:

A quick heads up.

We’re expecting high temperatures of 112°F on Tuesday. If you are of the school of thought that says we can’t fly when temperatures exceed 104°F because that’s the highest temperature on performance charts, we should probably plan to fly very early, before the temperature tops out. …

If you’re not of that school of thought — I learned to fly in Arizona so I’m not — we should be fine. The helicopter does have air conditioning, although I’ve never tested it in 112°F weather.

Please let me know what time you plan to arrive.

He replied, in part:

I am unaware of a temperature limitation that restricts operations of the R-44. We can complete the ground during the afternoon of the 28th so we can fly on the morning of the 29th to minimize the effects of the heat. …

So that’s telling me that it’s legal. (But he’s not taking any chances or doesn’t want to test my air conditioning.)

Never Exceed Speed
Here’s a limitations chart: Never Exceed Speed. If I extrapolated, I think operations at lower elevations would be fine, but I certainly wouldn’t exceed about 85 knots 44°C at 8000 feet. (Heck, the helicopter would be vibrating like crazy at that speed and elevation anyway.)

Is it safe? Well, as this “test pilot” could tell you, if you extrapolate the data in the charts, keeping in mind the aircraft’s gross weight and the altitude you would be operating at, it can be. Keep the aircraft light, don’t plan any high altitude landings, and keep your speed down.

Chances are, the helicopter will continue to operate in heat that you won’t want to be flying in anyway.

Wear a Damn Mask!

It ain’t over yet.

Yesterday, on Twitter, one of the folks I follow retweeted this:

I generally do not retweet something just because someone told me to. I’m not a mindless robot. But this one really resonated with me, mostly because I’d seen a couple in Home Depot a few days before that who were maskless and I wanted to assume it was because they had been vaccinated — and not because they were complete assholes idiots. Apparently some folks believe that because they’ve been vaccinated, they can’t get/carry/spread COVID-19.

This is not true.

So I retweeted it. And then I replied:

This response triggered two virus-denying assholes idiots to respond. One insinuated that it was impossible to “enjoy life” with a mask on.

Huh?

Science Mask
This is the mask I wore to get my vaccine last month. Double layer of fabric and comfortable. Why wouldn’t I wear this when among strangers in enclosed spaces?

First of all, let me clarify something. I don’t wear a mask at home. I don’t wear a mask while socializing (with some amount of distance) with my vaccinated friends and neighbors. I don’t wear a mask while driving. I don’t wear a mask anywhere that there’s no chance of swapping a significant amount of breathing air with someone I don’t know — for example, outdoors when I’m away from people. I basically wear a mask when I go shopping for groceries, hardware, etc. or talk to someone at my truck/Jeep/car window (think coffee, fast food, vet appointment). I wear a mask when I’m among strangers.

I don’t consider that a hardship. I also don’t believe it impacts my ability to “enjoy life.”

I have to wonder about people who make idiotic comments about a mask impacting their ability to “enjoy life.” Where do they think they need to wear their mask? What kind of mask are they wearing? Would they prefer to skip the mask and possibly get/spread COVID-19?

I’m sure that a person’s ability to “enjoy life” would be impacted by a COVID-19 infection, whether it’s their own infection or the infection of a friend or loved one who got it because of their selfish stupidity.

Wear a damn mask! It ain’t over yet.