My Old TV: Rejuvenated by Roku

I get a new Roku for my old TV and it’s like getting a new TV.

I’m not a big TV-watcher. I probably spend less than 10 hours a week in front of the tube, and a lot of that is watching late night TV hosts and educational content on YouTube. I don’t have cable or satellite TV and can’t bring in any over-the-air channels. I subscribe to Netflix and Disney Plus, have Amazon Prime video because I want free Amazon shipping, and recently added a one-year free subscription to Apple TV+ because it came with my new iPad.

I got my wasband’s circa 2008 45″ Samsung HDTV in our divorce. (It’s a funny story how I got it, but I blogged about that in passing elsewhere.) At the time — 2013 — it was still a decent TV and it had a surround sound system that worked great when I watched DVDs. I used the Roku stick that I got with it to connect to the Internet for my content. It was slow — like push a button on the remote and wait for Roku to react — but good enough.

I eventually sold the surround sound system on Craig’s List, bought a Blu-Ray player for the TV, and got a Samsung sound bar. (The TV had terrible sound without it.)

Time passed.

After seeing bigger, better TVs in the local Fred Meyer’s electronics department for two years, I finally broke down and bought one. Fred Meyer sells previous years TV models for dirt cheap; I bought a 65″ Samsung UHD smart TV for less than $500 when I combined the sale price and the “senior discount” I got for buying it on the first Tuesday of the month. I felt that I got a pretty good deal on something I would use less than 10 hours a week.

New TV
My new TV — which is at least two years old at this point — sits in the corner of the living room. I had to swap the coffee table for the TV table to get it to fit; the legs have quite a spread. The reflection is my red leather sofa — also an unexpected divorce acquisition — with the pillows and dog bed on it.

What to do with that old TV? Well, I wound up putting it in my bedroom, right across from the brown leather sofa that had (ironically) been in my old house’s TV room. I had to buy a table for it that matched the furniture. I attached the sound bar I’d bought for it to the new TV so it had crappy sound again, but that didn’t matter. By that time, the Roku was so agonizingly slow — especially compared with the new TV — that I lacked the patience to use it. I should add here that other than the little black and white TV I’d had in my first apartment after college (circa 1982), it was the first time I’d ever had a TV in the bedroom so I wasn’t accustomed to watching TV in bed anyway. But what else would I do with it?

Time passed. I rarely used the TV in the bedroom. The Roku stick made it unbearably slow.

I started talking to a neighbor about giving it to her. Literally giving it to her. She had a TV in her guest room that was on the fritz. Although my old Samsung was a lot bigger than what she wanted/needed, she said she’d take it. We just needed to wait for her husband’s cousin to get into town to help us carry it downstairs.

But I started thinking about other possibilities. It seemed to me that the thing that was slowing the TV down and making it an ordeal to use was the old Roku stick that was now 13 years old. Maybe a newer Roku would speed it up?

I asked on Twitter. Some folks said it wouldn’t be any better. Someone else suggested the Roku Streambar, which combined a sound bar with a Roku receiver. I looked it up. It happened to be on sale for $109 (from a normal price of $129) with free shipping and a 30-day money-back guarantee. I had nothing to lose. I’d give it a try and if it was still slow, I’d return it and get rid of the TV.

Roku Streambar
The Roku Streambar and its remote. It’s actually pretty small and doesn’t sound nearly as good as my Samsung sound bar on my new TV, but it’s good enough for me.

It arrived last week. I set it up Thursday night.

And I was (eventually) amazed.

After a few tries, the Roku connected to my 5G wifi network. (I’d tried connecting it to the two other networks first and it apparently didn’t like them, even though the signals were stronger.) I went through the setup process. It worked great — super fast, too — and even configured itself with the same channels I’d had set up on the old TV. At first, it didn’t play sound through the speaker and I couldn’t figure out why. I fiddled with the TV settings and cables and other stuff, and then restarted the Roku by mistake (I pulled out the wrong cable). When it started running again, the sound came through the Roku speaker. It worked just as it should.

The TV could be controlled by the small Roku remote — although I assume I’ll have to change the source with the TV remote if I ever want to watch a DVD. The remote even has a push to talk voice controller for switching channels and changing the volume.

And did I mention that it was fast?

I’m not exaggerating when I say that it was like getting a new TV.

TV w/Roku
My old TV in the bedroom. Yes, I do have to clean up those wires. The reflection in the TV is the window behind the sofa; you can see the top of my head, too.

Unfortunately for Terry, I’m going to keep the TV, at least for a while. I suggested she check out Fred Meyer. They’re still selling great TVs for great prices and she’ll likely get a better one than mine.

Mesa to Sedona by Helicopter, Part 2

Another video from the FlyingMAir YouTube channel.

Join me and fellow helicopter pilot Dave as we fly from Falcon Field in Mesa, AZ (FFZ) to Sedona, AZ (SEZ) along the Salt and Verde Rivers and through the Verde River Valley. I’ve cut this hour+ flight into multiple parts, each highlighting a specific area of our flight. In this video, we begin just north of the confluence of the Salt and Verde Rivers and detour for a close look at the fountain at Fountain Hills. From there, it’s over Rio Verde and back along the river for a low-level flight over the autumn colors and Bartlett Dam. The video ends over Bartlett Reservoir, where we’re continuing along the lake and river beyond. Along the way, you’ll hear our in-cockpit conversation about what we’re seeing and more.

Dave is an airline pilot who is working through his helicopter ratings. At the time of this flight, he was a private helicopter pilot; he got his commercial helicopter rating a few weeks later. Dave and I split the cost of this flight; I flew to Sedona and he flew back.

Many, many thanks to channel members and Patreon patrons. It’s your membership dollars that made this flight in Arizona possible.

NOTE: This is the 1080 HD version of this video. A 4K UHD version without the Member Wall is available to channel members at the Sponsor and Funder levels.

How to Follow Just the Content You Want on This Blog

I explain how to follow this blog in a way that weeds out the content you don’t care about.

One of the things in my life that I’m proud of is that I’m interested in a lot of things. My friend Bill refers to this as curiosity — I’m curious about things so I learn more about them. But while others might be content with getting quick answers to any burning questions about a topic, I’m often willing to do a deep dive and learn more, sometimes firsthand by doing. That’s what got me involved in things like beekeeping, jewelry making, glass fusing, and other “hobbies gone wild.”

And then I blog about it to share some of what I’ve learned.

I’ve been blogging since 2003 — yeah, I’m coming up on 20 years now! — and this blog’s 2300+ posts cover a lot of topics in a wide variety of ways. Back when I first started blogging and people were writing about making “successful blogs,” they all recommended one thing: stick to a topic. If you’ve explored this blog at all, you know that’s a recommendation I have been unable to follow. I write about lots of topics because I’m interested in lots of topics. And while it is possible to maintain multiple blogs, I simply don’t want to do that.

What does that leave my readers with? A hodgepodge of posts about all kinds of things: jewelry making, flying helicopters, cooking, computers, reading/writing, video creation, etc., etc. The list goes on and on.

I’m not too naive to realize that not everyone is interested in everything that I am. And not everyone comes here to read every word. In fact, I’m sure I lose a lot of new readers by delivering up posts about topics that don’t interest them nearly as much as the topics that originally brought them here. I get it.

I addressed this the other day after a comment from a reader named Susan brought it up:

Comment
An exchange on this blog between me and Susan, who likes the fact that I cover a lot of topics here. That weird symbol is supposed to be a shrug emoji.

With all that said, I thought I’d take a moment to help readers zero in on just the new content that interests them using several techniques.

Subscribe and Choose

Subscribe Form
Here’s what the form looks like. You can find it near the top of the sidebar on any page of this site.

The easiest way to learn about new content that might interest you is to subscribe to the blog via email. You’ll find a form on the sidebar on every page. Put your email address in it and click the button. You’ll get a confirmation in email to make sure you really want it.

From that point forward, you’ll get an email message every time I post something new — generally two to 20 times a month. See a topic that interests you? Click the link in the email to come here and read it. Otherwise, just delete the email.

And you can always get off the list. The unsubscribe feature really does work.

I don’t use this for anything other than blog post updates. I don’t share email addresses. I don’t spam.

Follow Me on Twitter

If you’re on Twitter and you don’t want your inbox to take in any more subscriptions, you can follow me on Twitter. I’m @mlanger there. All of my new blog posts are automatically tweeted to my account, so it’s the same as subscribing to the blog. But you also get a running commentary of maximum 240-character posts of what I’m thinking about or doing.

(Some folks would likely prefer the blog subscription.)

Bookmark a Topic

All the blog posts here are assigned a category (topic) and most are assigned at least one tag. (Topics are listed on every page in the sidebar; tags are listed on the home page in a cloud format in the sidebar.) This makes it easy for readers to find the content they want that interests them. But did you know that you could bookmark a category (topic) or tag?

Share This
You’ll find a Share This area at the end of each blog post.

On a post that interests you, scroll down to the Share This area. In addition to icons you can click to share the post on various social media and via email — which I do encourage you to use if you think your friends might enjoy it — there is a “Posted in” section and a “Tagged” section, each of which are followed by links. Click the category (topic) or tag link that closely matches what interests you. You’ll see a page with the most recent posts with the same category (topic) or tag.

Bookmark that page. This is something you do in your browser and I’m not going to explain how because there are lots of browsers and each has its own method. I know that in Firefox, which I use on my computers, the shortcut key to get started in Command-D (I’m on a Mac).

New Jewelry Making Topic

If you’ve got sharp eyes, you may have noticed the new Jewelry Making topic in the sidebar. I added that the other day. I’d been using the Hobbies Gone Wild topic for posts related to jewelry making and realized that that particular endeavor had progressed far beyond what one would consider a hobby. So I pulled those posts out into their own category, mostly to make it easy for folks interested in jewelry making to find them..

Once you’ve bookmarked the category or topic, you can check in periodically to see if there’s anything new of interest to you. I recommend once a month, although you could come by more frequently. You might want to do the same thing with any other sites/blogs that interests you. Then make check in part of your routine — maybe a rainy Saturday morning coffee routine.

And do you see that Add a Comment link in the Share This area? Here’s a tip: you can click that and add a comment about what you’ve just read and maybe encourage me to write more about it. After all, it was Susan’s comment (shown above) that got me to write this.

Subscribe to an RSS Feed of a Topic

In the old days we used Feed Readers to follow blogs without having to go to the blog itself. Do those things still exist?

Although I know I’ve written extensively about feeds in the past, I’m not going to do so again here. Instead, I’ll share this from the WordPress glossary:

A feed is a function of special software that allows “Feedreaders” to access a site automatically looking for new content and then posting the information about new content and updates to another site. This provides a way for users to keep up with the latest and hottest information posted on different blogging sites. Some Feeds include RSS (alternately defined as “Rich Site Summary” or “Really Simple Syndication”), Atom or RDF files. Dave Shea, author of the web design weblog Mezzoblue has written a comprehensive summary of feeds. Feeds generally are based on XML technology.

If you’re a bit of a techie and want to use feedreader to follow topics in blog, be aware that you can modify a blog’s feed URL to specify a specific category (topic) or tag. For example, if you’re interested in flying and want to subscribe with your feedreader to a feed about that category (topic), you might try

http://www.AnEclecticMind.com/category/flying/feed

(Too techie for you? Me, too. When I stopped writing computer how-to books around 2012, I stopped being a techie and became a mere user. Now I don’t research and write about any tech unless it’s related to something I need to do with my computers.)

The idea is to set up your feedreader with all the blogs that interest you and open that application when you want to check in on your favorite blogs.

The Point

The point of all this is that you don’t have to visit the blog and wade through whatever’s new that doesn’t interest you to find something that might. You can either get a list of new posts delivered to your inbox and click links to explore the ones that interest you or use various techniques to bookmark or subscribe to a feed for the categories (topics) or tags that interest you.

Whatever you decide, don’t be discouraged by the wide range of topics here. If you found this blog, it’s likely because there was something here you liked. There may be more now and in the future. Any of these techniques will help you keep on top of what’s new.

B&S Gauge Thicknesses, Saw Blades, and Drill Bits

Another handy chart for jewelry makers.

The other day, I published a chart of Minimum Metal Gauges for making jewelry. I’d made the chart for my own use, based on information I got from the Rio Grande website.

But what I’ve really wanted for a long while was a single chart that listed B&S gauge sizes, the corresponding measurements in millimeters and inches, and the correct jeweler’s saw blade and drill bit sizes for each gauge. For some reason, I could not find all of this information on one chart anywhere.

So I made one by combining information from the Contenti and Livingston Jewelers websites. Here’s the result:

Thicknesses, blades, and bits
This is the chart I’ve been looking for! In the end, I had to make it myself from multiple sources of information.

You can download this chart as a PDF from my public Dropbox folder.

Keep in mind that although I do have a set of jeweler’s drill bits, I don’t use them. Instead, I have a set of bits in various fractional mm sizes — I pick the drill bit I need from that set because I can get a much closer drill bit size for my needs.

Why Helicopters Don’t Normally Take Off Vertically

Just because you can do something, doesn’t mean you should do it.

Every once in a while someone watching one of my YouTube videos or searching for answers on the web that bring them to this blog ask why helicopters don’t take off straight up. I guess these folks know that it’s possible and they’ve seen it often enough in the movies to think that it’s normal or at least okay. It’s neither.

I actually explain why in my much longer post about the Deadman’s Curve. But I’ll try to keep it simpler here.

The Basics

Let me start off by saying that helicopters can glide. Yes, if the engine fails, the pilot still has control over the helicopter and can fly it, using autorotation, to the ground. If conditions are right and the landing zone is appropriate and the pilot’s skills are sufficient, the pilot and passengers should be able to walk away and the helicopter might even be able to fly again.

Notice that I mentioned three ifs:

  • if the conditions are right
  • if the landing zone is appropriate
  • if the pilot’s skills are sufficient

Height-Velocity Diagram for R44 HelicopterIt’s that first if that the pilot usually has complete control over: the conditions of flight. That’s where the Height-Velocity Diagram comes into play. This diagram, which is part of the Pilot Operating Handbook (POH) that pilots are required to know inside and out (and even carry on board, as if we could consult it while flying), shows the flight profiles in which an autorotation is most likely to be completed successfully. By “flight profiles,” I’m referring to a combination of airspeed and altitude.

To meet the requirements of that first if — in other words, to fly the safest flight profile in the unlikely event of an engine failure — the pilot needs to stay out of the shaded area of the Height-Velocity Diagram. A recommended takeoff profile is shown on this chart by a dashed line that starts at 0 knots and less than 10 feet off the ground, accelerates through 45 knots while climbing less than 15 feet, and then climbs out at a speed greater than 50 knots.

Make a mental picture of that. If you’re not going to climb above 10 feet until you get to at least 30 or 40 knots, are you going to be flying straight up? No. You’re going to be taking off a lot like an airplane might, with a bunch of forward movement before you start climbing.

This is why a “normal takeoff” for a helicopter climbs out after gaining airspeed — instead of climbing straight up. It’s for safety reasons.

(This is only part of the reason why we don’t land straight down, but I’ll save that for another blog post if I get requests for it.)

FAA Guidance

The FAA has a wealth of free information about flying, including “handbooks” that explain exactly how to fly. I’ve linked to the Helicopter Flying Handbook many times; if you don’t have a copy of this excellent guide and are interested in flying helicopters, download it in PDF format here.

Here’s what it says about performing a normal takeoff from a hover (position 1 in the image that follows) on Page 9-12:

Start the helicopter moving by smoothly and slowly easing the cyclic forward (position 2). As the helicopter starts to move forward, increase the collective, as necessary, to prevent the helicopter from sinking and adjust the throttle to maintain rpm. The increase in power requires an increase in the proper antitorque pedal to maintain heading. Maintain a straight takeoff path throughout the takeoff.

While accelerating through effective translational lift (position 3), the helicopter begins to climb, and the nose tends to rise due to increased lift. At this point, adjust the collective to obtain normal climb power and apply enough forward cyclic to overcome the tendency of the nose to rise. At position 4, hold an attitude that allows a smooth acceleration toward climbing airspeed and a commensurate gain in altitude so that the takeoff profile does not take the helicopter through any of the cross-hatched or shaded areas of the height/velocity diagram. As airspeed increases (position 5), place the aircraft in trim and allow a crab to take place to maintain ground track and a more favorable climb configuration. As the helicopter continues to climb and accelerate to best rate-of-climb, apply aft cyclic pressure to raise the nose smoothly to the normal climb attitude.

Normal Takeoff
This is an exaggerated view. In reality, each position would be a lot farther apart horizontally.

In the above text, in an R44, effective translational lift (ETL) occurs between 15 and 25 knots, normal climb power is about 45 knots, and then climb out power (best rate of climb) is 60 knots. So you basically stay within 10 feet of the ground until you’re at 45 knots, then accelerate while climbing to 60 knots, and then climb out at 60. These numbers may be different for other aircraft but are likely similar.

Real Life Situations

Watch My Helicopter Videos on YouTube

Time for a shameless plug…

Flying M Air Logo

If you like helicopters, you’ll love the FlyingMAir YouTube Channel. Check it out for everything from time-lapse annual inspections to cockpit POV autorotation practice to a flight home from a taco dinner at a friend’s house — and more.

Of course, one of the benefits of helicopters in many operational situations is that it can fly straight up. For example, I can take off from a confined space — perhaps a forest clearing — by being able to climb up above obstacles (the trees around me) before picking up airspeed and flying away. Is this safe? Well, there isn’t any signifiant danger unless the engine quits. And although the chances of the engine quitting are very slim, it is possible.

Years ago, while doing a rides event at the local airport with some fellow pilots who were working with me for cherry season, I noticed that one of the pilots was departing our landing zone by climbing straight up for 20 or 30 or even 50 feet before gaining airspeed. He was putting the aircraft right in the shaded area of the Height-Velocity Diagram. In other words, he was adding risk to his flight by basically ignoring the recommended takeoff profile.

With passengers on board. At a crowded event.

I’ve got a pretty good imagination and was immediately able to “see” what could happen if his engine quit. The helicopter would drop down with its blades still spinning. Everyone on board would likely be killed or seriously injured. And when all those spinning parts hit the ground and started flinging off in every direction, they’d likely kill or injure dozens of onlookers.

What were the chances of his engine quitting? About as close to zero as you can get without being zero. But that isn’t zero. It could happen.

After seeing him do this at least four times and realizing he wasn’t going to stop, I got on the radio and told him to stop. He asked me why. Knowing that I was talking on a frequency that could be heard by his passengers, my passengers, any other aircraft flying around the area, and anyone monitoring on the ground, I kept it simple: “Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should.” I let him think a bit about why he shouldn’t and he stopped. (If he didn’t, I would have kicked him out of the event.)

Over the following month or so, I got to know this pilot better and I didn’t like what I saw. I don’t need to go into details here, but I feel that he’s the kind of pilot who will likely get himself killed doing something dumb in a helicopter. I’m just glad I took steps to make sure it didn’t happen on my watch.

Question Answered?

If this doesn’t answer the question about why helicopters don’t take off vertically, I don’t know what could. Please don’t hesitate to share your questions, comments, and stories in the comments for this post. Thanks!