Another Clouds Time-Lapse

With clouds in the valley before dawn, I set up a time-lapse camera to capture the cloud movement throughout the morning.

I don’t know about you, but I absolutely love time-lapse movies. They make it possible for us to see movement that is normally too slow to perceive.

On October 31, 2024, there were thick clouds in the valley below my home. I know from experience that our winter thermal inversions can put on a good cloud show and those inversions are happening earlier and earlier every year. I set up a GoPro in Hyperlapse mode and let it run all day. Here’s the first few hours of the cloud show, sped up with the hyperlapse as well as a 400% increase in speed in video editing. The result is a smooth, high-speed look at what the clouds did that morning.

Enjoy!

Why There are So Many Ads on YouTube

It’s a money grab, plain and simple, and YouTube encourages creators to maximize the number of ads per video.

I’ve been a YouTube content creator for about 15 years now, starting my channels as a way to share videos of things going on in my not-quite-average life. I had the good fortune to create a video that went viral — 12.5 million views so far — and has not only earned me thousands of dollars since I put it on YouTube, but was the driving force to get my subscriber count on the FlyingMAir YouTube channel up to nearly 80,000.

My History as a Content Creator

It’s nice to earn money on content you create or, technically, intellectual property (IP). From 1990, when I left my last full-time job to become a freelance writer and computer consultant, to around 2012, I earned the vast majority of my income as what I insist on calling a content creator. (For some reason, many creators are opposed to that term. I’m not sure why.) I wrote books and articles and made videos for various publishers. I even did a little self publishing of books. I created the content that people wanted to consume. What else would you call that?

During that time, I was able to not only fund the training and asset acquisition for my next career as a helicopter pilot, but I also socked away enough money to retire* at age 62.

My YouTube channels — including the one for Flying M Air which I no longer create videos for — continue to earn me money with a direct deposit into my checking account every month. How is that money earned? Through advertising.

YouTube Ad Revenue

Love YouTube but don’t like ads?

Do what I did: become a YouTube Premium subscriber. (Sign up on the Web and not through your Apple device and you can save $5/month.) Although I was skeptical until I got a free trial, I’m now convinced that it’s worth every single penny. You’ll still have to fast-forward through the sponsorship crap, though.

If you watch YouTube, you know how annoying the ads can be. There are pre-roll ads and post-roll ads and mid-roll ads. You can skip some of them after a few seconds but are forced to sit through others. Most of them are short, but when you have three or four in a row, they take up (too much) time.

For a new channel that cannot be monetized by its creator, the creator has absolutely no control over the ads and doesn’t make a single penny from them. So if you’re watching videos on a channel with 567 subscribers, remember that 100% of the revenue for the ads you see go right to Google. (If that channel creator has a tip jar of any sort and you like the videos, consider sending a few dollars their way to motivate/reward them for hard work.)

Once a channel can be monetized through a share of advertising revenue, creators get a tiny portion — literally just pennies sometimes — on every thousand views. So yeah: unless a video has a lot of views and a lot of ads, you’re not going to make very much. I could go on and on about how some creators game the system to fool people into clicking on their content with misleading titles and thumbnails, but I’ll save that for another day. This post is about the ad revenue.

If you can’t control the number of views a video gets — and new channels usually have a steep hill to climb to get regular viewers — you can still control the number of ads that appear with your content. Again, there are three types: pre-roll, mid-roll, and post-roll. Google isn’t shy about letting you know that the more kinds of ads you allow in your content, the more likely they are to push your content out on viewer Home pages.

Mid-Roll Ad Idea
Google does what it can to get you to maximize shared revenue.

And that brings me to what triggered today’s posts: the “idea” that appeared on my YouTube Studio dashboard for my MariaLanger channel, which just reached the point where I can monetize ads. When I set up ads for my existing videos, I specified pre-roll and post-roll ads, but turned off mid-roll ads. Why? Well, the main reason is that I hate them and I don’t want to torture my viewers by forcing them to watch them. I try to make my content smooth and continuous and breaking it up with tacky, annoying ads in the middle of it is, well, tacky and annoying. I respect my viewers.

(That’s not to say I might not change my mind in the future. On very long videos, I can specify exactly where a mid-roll ad can appear, so I can place it in a way to make it less obnoxious. I’d rather not, but I’m also not creating video for charity. I want revenue from my work and the tip jar isn’t working yet for me. Want to support my content creation efforts? Buy me a coffee.)

The reason so many people allow mid-roll ads is because they see “ideas” like this in their Studio dashboard. They want to make money and they are seduced by the possibilities. It’s the same reason they set up memberships or Patreon accounts. Even if they started their YouTube channel for fun, once they get to the point where they’re making money, they want to make more.

The Trap for Creators

YouTube Content Creation as a Job

Please don’t think I’m discouraging content creators from making YouTube content creation their full time jobs. There are many creators on YouTube who do just that. They have teams of writers — many of whom lean too heavily on Wikipedia — and video editors and they appear as talking heads reading off a teleprompter with a script while stock images that vaguely apply to what they’re saying appear onscreen. They have multiple channels and they come out with new content every day. These folks are making shit-tons of money while they pay a staff to do much of the work. It’s a business for them.

There are a folks with more modest setups that do much of their own research, writing, and video work. Some of them are really good; I subscribe to more than a few. But the ones who are most successful have YouTube content creation as a full-time job. You see, once you stop feeding the beast, the beast looks elsewhere for its next meal.

So unless you’re lucky enough to have a viral video after you’ve already become part of the Partner Program with a share of advertising revenue, you can expect to do a lot of work to build a YouTube channel to the point where it actually makes real money for you. Good luck.

I definitely get it. My FlyingMAir YouTube channel was earning, for a while, $500+ per month. One month, I took in $1200. That’s some real, bill-paying money!

Of course I had mid-roll ads and of course I set up a membership program and even a Patreon account. Do you know what that did for me? It turned content creation back into a job, something I had to do all the time to keep members and patrons and Google happy. I woke up to this realization when I was spending more time editing video than actually flying and watched revenues drop as the Google algorithm favored other creators more than me. I had fallen into a trap and I needed to get out.

Eventually, I sold the helicopter and could no longer create new content for the channel. I killed the membership and Patreon programs so I wouldn’t owe anyone anything. It was a huge weight off my chest.

A New Channel

So here I am, facing a new trap with my MariaLanger channel. This channel is older than FlyingMAir and actually still has a bunch of the helicopter videos I created before I spun off the helicopter channel. But it never had a good subscriber base until recently. I have just 1852 subscribers as I type this and am getting new subscribers at the modest rate of about 90 per month. I qualified for the partner program back in August and just qualified for advertising revenue in October. I’ve earned a whopping $9.03 so far this month.

I should mention here why I suddenly picked up so many new subscribers. It’s the boating videos I was creating while I traveled the Great Loop. And I have at least 40 more to come over the next year or so. The video has been shot; it’s just a matter of editing it into something worth watching. And yes, I’ll be getting back to that, probably this week. Editing video is no fun on a laptop, but I suspect the 27″ monitor I just bought will make it less tedious. That $9.03 will go toward the purchase. (Did I mention how much camera and lighting and audio and computer hardware you’ll need to buy to succeed as a YouTube content creator? That’s something no one tells you.)

And That’s Why

So that’s why there are so many ads on YouTube. Creators want to make money and Google does everything in its power to convince creators to include as many ads as possible in their channel content.


*My retirement is not a “stop working” retirement. I could never stop working and I don’t think anyone else should, either. Now I do the work I want to do when I want to do it — and take a shit-ton of time off.

Aurora Out My Window

I see the aurora for the first time — well, sort of — right from the comfort of my own home.

If you pay attention at all to science-related news, you are probably aware that the sun is near the peak of its 11-year solar activity cycle, with lots of sunspots and coronal mass ejections. This has made aurora a lot more visible than usual, making it possibly for people to see it as far south as Arizona and Texas.

I don’t live that far south. I live in north central Washington state. Opportunities to view the aurora abound at my home — which has a perfectly unobstructed view to the north, right to the horizon — but I’ve spent much of the past two years away from home. Ironically, from June through August, I was traveling at latitudes farther north than where my home is, but I just didn’t see the aurora on any nights I might have. I could blame weather (clouds), ambient lighting (being near a city), or a lack of clear view to the north (from trees or mountains).

But when I got home, I became determined to see the aurora from my home.

The Science of the Aurora

I would be remiss if I did not mention the excellent Space Weather and Aurora Dashboard pages constantly updated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). It provides a wealth of information about the aurora, from forecasts and current conditions to basic and detailed information about what causes the aurora.

For example, NOAA’s Aurora Tutorial page starts its explanation of the aurora like this:

The aurora is formed from interactions between the solar wind streaming out from the sun and Earth’s protective magnetic field, or magnetosphere. The aurora is one manifestation of geomagnetic activity or geomagnetic storms. As the solar wind increases in speed and the interplanetary magnetic field embedded in the solar wind turns southward, the geomagnetic activity will increase and the aurora will become brighter, more active, and move further from the poles. Even moderate solar wind creates aurora so there is usually a weak aurora somewhere even when there isn’t a big geomagnetic storm.

There are two types of solar events that create big geomagnetic storms that are associated with bright and active aurora. The first is a Coronal Mass Ejection, or CME, which can be described as a billion tons of plasma ejected from the sun, traveling at a million miles per hour. When a CME arrives at Earth, it can produce some of the biggest geomagnetic storms and thus, some of the brightest and most active auroras that extend furthest toward the equator. The second solar event that can create moderate sized geomagnetic storms is called a coronal hole. Coronal holes are the source of high speed solar wind streams. When these high speed streams arrive at Earth, they can produce active auroras. But the geomagnetic storms and aurora associated with coronal holes is less active than those from the biggest and fastest CME’s.

Later on that page, it explains what causes the individual colors you might see. This is a great place to start if you want to learn more about how the aurora forms and when viewing is best.

Forecasts < Actual Conditions

My quest to see the aurora started with the forecasts on the Aurora Dashboard page. Each day, NOAA provides a forecast for tonight and tomorrow night. You can see an example in the top two images in the screen capture below. Like any weather forecast, this is a prediction of what might happen based on data and models. In this particular example, the forecast looked good for two nights in a row.

Aurora Dashboard
In the early morning hours of October 10, the forecast for that night was a lot more optimistic than reality.

I’ve lost a lot of sleep trying to see the aurora. In this example, the forecast told me it should be visible where I live. But this page also provides a very short term forecast for the next 35 minutes. The image on the left is for the northern hemisphere and it painted a truer picture of the situation. The chances of seeing the aurora where I lived was slim. And, of course, I didn’t see it on the night of October 9-10.

Short Term Forecast
The short term forecast looked a lot better on the night of October 10-11.

But things were different on the night of October 10-11. I knew they were different when my social media feed on Mastodon began filling with aurora photos. I watched the Aurora Dashboard and was rewarded with a very promising short term forecast image. I set up a GoPro pointed mostly at the northern horizon and sky and turned on the night hyperlapse feature. Then I turned off all the lights in my home, including the solar string lights on my deck, and hung out on the deck to watch the sky.

Understand that my home might be 2 miles down a gravel road 10 miles from town, but it has a commanding view of the entire valley, including the brightly lighted cities of Wenatchee and East Wenatchee. This is not a good place for stargazing. No matter how much I tried to get my eyes adjusted to the dark, it simply wasn’t dark. But soon, after a while, I started seeing a reddish glow in the sky. I took a photo with my iPhone 13 Pro — yes, I know it’s time for an update; maybe after Christmas — and was shocked to see auroral streaks of pink lines in the photo.

First Aurora Shot
This was the first photo I took from my deck. It was 7:13 PM, less than an hour after sunset.

For the next few hours, I moved from inside my nice warm (but dark) house to outside on my cool deck. I tried hard to see beyond the faint streaks in the sky, but every time I took a photo, the photo revealed far more than I was seeing. It was out there but my eyes just couldn’t take in enough auroral light to see it very well.

Antoher Aurora Shot
I took this photo a little while later. The predominant colors were a pink and an almost lime green.

Another Aurora Shot
Here’s another shot from a while later.

It was rewarding but also frustrating. This was probably the first time in my life when I could photograph something better than I could see it. But I wanted to see it! With my eyes!

The sky started to cloud up a little and my frustration got the better of me. After a while, I gave up.

The Video

This was apparently a mistake. I should have tried again around midnight. How do I know this? Well, remember that GoPro I set up? Here’s what it captured before its battery died:

The Next Aurora Viewing

I’m watching the forecast pages closely. The next time we have a strong forecast, I’ll be ready with multiple cameras — including my Nikon, on a tripod — to capture it. But next time, I’ll set up a lounge chair on the deck, snuggle in a sleeping bag, and watch until I can see it better with my own eyes.