A short, engaging video from the UK CAA for drone pilots.
This morning, one of my Twitter pilot friends in the UK shared a one-minute video from the UK CAA that quickly and effectively told drone pilots to be look and listen for helicopters that might be flying at their altitude. Remember drone pilots are supposed to stay under 400 feet altitude (in both the UK and the US) and helicopters have no minimum altitude (at least not in the US). That means we share that space. Of course, if drones illegally (or with a waiver) fly higher, that’s even more space that we share.
I watched the video. It was excellent. A link in the tweet pointed to the “full version” and I clicked it. It’s only 3 minutes long and has the same basic message but includes some interesting B-roll footage of an EMS helicopter and operations. Something to keep watchers engaged while the message is shared. Here it is:
Again, I know this is a UK CAA production, but it applies in the US, too. And likely many other countries that have drone/UAV regulations.
When I retweeted this with a mention the FAA’s Twitter account, the FAA — to my surprise — immediately responded to a link to their YouTube playlist:
.@mlanger we love your enthusiasm around #drone safety! We have a series of drone webinars and live Q&As that help to educate drone operators on the rules and how to fly safely at https://t.co/KAeFZwAGC6.
— The FAA (@FAANews) September 12, 2019
I took a look. What I found didn’t surprise me at all. It was the same dull FAA content I’ve been looking at for the past 20 years. Short slideshows that look like they were produced with PowerPoint 95, narrated with a boring authoritative voice. Screen captures of 30+ minute long webinars featuring a tiny talking head and the same dull slide shows. This is the FAA’s idea of continuing education: producing content that no one wants to watch.
See for yourself. Watch the video I embedded above. Then try to watch a few that the FAA linked to. Do you see the difference? I do.
When I critiqued the FAA on Twitter, they responded with this:
Like some of these: https://t.co/db5g2KfhsF
Are you a #FAASTeam Rep? If not, we would love for you to volunteer and then create some some safety videos with us. https://t.co/MxO8TbDwg7
— FAA Safety Briefing (@FAASafetyBrief) September 12, 2019
I looked at a few of these videos. Some of them are indeed better. One or two are actually pretty good.
Of course, leave it to the FAA to try to enlist me as a volunteer to help them. They have a lot of nerve. Their often absurd rules cost me money that lines the pockets of other businesses without increasing safety. The requirement for VFR-only aircraft to spend $10K to $20K to install a completely useless radar altimeter is one example. The requirement to have a mechanic remove and reinstall my doors when I need them off is another. But now I’m getting way off topic. And angry.
My point is, the UK CAA put together a short, interesting, and informative video (embedded above). We need more of that and we need the FAA — with or without industry partners — to step up to the plate and provide it.