Proof (again) that many people who buy on eBay are idiots.
A few months back, I speculated that eBay was for suckers when I reported on the condition of a “mint” condition lens I’d bought at almost retail and an auction for another lens that I passed on when the bid went more than $100 higher than the selling price on Amazon.com.
What “Mint” Really Means
According to my Mac OS X Dictionary widget, mint, when used as an adjective, means “in pristine condition; as new.” If that’s the case, then why is the term “mint,” when used on eBay, always followed up with additional describing words and phrases like “It is in mint condition, no scratches, no dust and no marks”?
Hello? Mint means mint. Like new. New items don’t have scratches or dust.
Unless, of course, you’re dealing with an eBay item.
The lens I bought that was in “mint” condition looked as if it had been on a shelf for two years. Yes, some of the dust had been wiped off, but there was enough in the cracks and crevices to tell the tale. And there was the tiniest of scratches on the lens closest to the camera body. That’s not mint.
And my husband, who recently decided that the low profile wheels that came with his used AMG weren’t quite right for Wickenburg’s dirt roads, replaced them with “mint” condition stock wheels. In the seller’s world, “mint” is an adjective that can be applied to tire rims that have obviously been scraped along a curb. No amount of polishing will get those scratches out. My husband’s good deal wasn’t such a good deal after all.
I try to use words carefully. Because of that, I would never apply the word “mint” to any item that has been used in any way. Unfortunately, I’m one of the few people who take the meaning of words like “mint” seriously.
The Price Thing Still Cracks Me Up
The other day, I bought another lens from Amazon.com — but not before I started “watching” an auction for a “4-month old,” “mint” condition lens on eBay. The auction ended a little while ago and the lens sold for $454. Add $19.95 shipping and the final price was just $5 less than I paid Amazon for a brand new lens.
I don’t know about you, but I think it’s worth the extra $5 to get something brand new in a box, shipped by a reputable company than to get suckered in by yet another eBay seller offering “mint” merchandise that isn’t.
So the question is, don’t these eBay buyers do their homework? Don’t they realize that they can buy brand new items for less than they’re paying for [often] misrepresented used items?
Or does the excitement of the auction process get them to bid stupidly?
Discover more from An Eclectic Mind
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I’d call it an addiction. It’s like betting, and many people really don’t know when or where to quit. So, yes, I’d say the last phrase applies. :P
MJ Valentes last blog post..Dez coisinhas giras…
Morning,
Nope, not many folk know how to research retail price online apparently. There’s a search option for eBay that allows you to see the closing prices of similar auctions….when I blogged about that, I found many regular eBayers had never noticed that feature.
Data points,
Barbara
Barbara Lings last blog post..21 Days to a more profitable blog – Day 9! Add Amazon to your WordPress blog sidebar
Just love your blog… :)
I use the term new in box but only when the product has NEVER been opened. I will open it to photograph it but then put it straight back in the box. If something isn’t new in box I describe in detail.
I posted for warning stupid ebay ID: kiangtong88
[address redacted]
After bought he will left low rating DSR then he would contact seller for request “Discount” for the next coming time if seller do not make for him. Negative feedback will coming to you